ORACLENERD twitter/oraclenerd view chet justice's profile on LinkedIn feed oraclenerd t-shirts Unemployment Clock:

  Oracle + MySQL = Monopoly?
BRUSSELS -- The European Commission opened an antitrust investigation into Oracle Corp.'s $7.4 billion acquisition of Sun Microsystems Inc., dealing a blow to Oracle's efforts to keep Sun customers who are increasingly being wooed by rival technology companies.
That's from EU to Probe Oracle-Sun Deal on September 3rd.

Ostensibly, this is about MySQL.
In announcing the probe, the European Union's executive arm cited concern that the deal would stymie competition for database software...Sun makes a low-cost alternative [MySQL] that is increasing in popularity.
With all of the database offerings out there, how can this even be a consideration?

Let's say Oracle decides to squash MySQL (which I doubt), are you telling me that it can't or won't be forked? Are you also telling me that these businesses have no other choices in database software?
monopoly ((economics) a market in which there are many buyers but only one seller) "a monopoly on silver"; "when you have a monopoly you can ask any price you like"
The wikipedia entry is littered with words like "exclusive" and phrases like "sole control." Where is the monopoly?

This isn't about Oracle, specifically, either. I could never understand the charges against Microsoft. Shouldn't they be allowed to build their systems the way they want to?

Oracle Has Customers Over a Barrell
If Oracle buys Sun, it could cripple or kill the rival product. "The Commission has an obligation to ensure that customers would not face reduced choice or higher prices as a result of this takeover," Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said in a statement.
Rival? Really? Didn't Marten Mickos say that MySQL wasn't, or didn't want to be, a competitor of Oracle?

Where is the reduced choice?

Besides (please correct me if I am wrong), aren't these customers paying for support and not the product itself?

Anyway, there are plenty of database options out there. If MySQL does fork, it might just be better for everyone involved because they'll take it in a new or different direction.

Please help this confused soul and explain to me how this might be a monopoly.

Labels: , ,

 
Comments:
It's a monopoly, duh. Just like how Ford Echos are denting BMW 700-series sales.
 
exactly.
 
The concept of monopoly in the EU has always been a bit vague, to put it very mildly.
Even with all their regulations to avoid monopolies, the fact remains that Wintel has a nearly 100% presence on the EU desktop, public servant or not.
Apparently whatever they do, it ain't working.
Maybe because, it's wrong?
;)
 
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<<Home


Guest Authors

How To

Popular

Previous Posts

Code Projects

Archives
August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 /


Aggregated by OraNA